betterlobsterlaw.com
From the 1985 Connecticut Study on the Effects of Trawling on Lobster
 
Home Our Plan Facts & Figures News & Opinion FAQ Support About Us
   

On Resource Allocation

  • "Objectively stated, the controversy poses the question "Who is entitled to take from a public resource?"

  • "Pot fishermen are the more 'traditional' catchers of lobsters...Comments heard during the present controversy include 'lobsters should only be taken by pot fishermen', 'If they want to take them, let them use pots', and 'They're transients - they only come in to take the cream off the top.'  Clearly, some pot lobstermen feel that since they are backed by recent history as the principal users, they ought to have sole right to the resource."

  • "The desire of trawl fishermen to take lobsters is a function of the "mixed-species" nature of the generalized trawl fishery.  In such a fishery, a variety of species - seasonally abundant and seasonally distributed - account for a composition of landings dependent on perhaps five principal species and 5-10 of lesser importance.  Lobsters are one of those species which, at certain times of the year, are necessary to make the day's catch profitable."

  • "...the 100 lobster limit is an effective cap on directed lobster trawling but one which equitably allows trawlers fishing in a mixed species fishery to retain lobsters taken incidental to the taking of other species."

  • "We believe the question for resource managers and legislators is 'To what extent should government involve itself in the resolution of a business conflict?'  If the controversy was rooted only in the production of a commodity or even a food item grown on a farm, the answer might very well be 'Not at all.'

    "However, at issue is a natural resource under the ownership of no one, but is managed under public stewardship.  Government - as the steward - is responsible for maintaining the quality of those resources within its jurisdiction.  Once the quality of the resource is assured, government often has a role in allocating resources, that is, determining who among the users has a right to take them." 

  • "We believe that government can best serve both the general public and fishery competitors by minimizing its involvement in the controversy - with one very important exception, relating to the initial responsibility of government as the steward of those resources within its jurisdiction."

  • "We believe that both pot fishermen and trawl fishermen have a right to harvest the lobster resource.  Both - properly managed and with due consideration for the conservation requirements of the resource - can exist and use the resource but only if each learns to respect the rights of his competitor to to the same."

 Back to 1985 Lobster Survey home | Back to News & Opinion